emmagrant01: (Trekkie pervert)
So I was watching some gay porn for fic research (no, really) and while it's occasionally fairly interesting, I usually seem to find it incredibly boring and really not erotic at all. It always seems so fake, with the actors glancing at the camera occasionally like they're in an episode of "The Office" and making these incredibly cheesy groans while looking stoned. And it takes forEVER for them to finish, and they're never actually that hard and the whole thing is just incredibly awkward to watch.

And when it comes down to it, watching two people have sex just isn't what does it for me. I know that 80% of the people reading this probably feel the same way, and we've had these discussions hundreds of times online and in person, but every time I click over to pornotube to see the various ways a certain sex act can be done, it always leaves me feeling kind of disappointed, you know?

So I watch gay porn in a fairly clinical way, looking for details to use in a written sex scene. What it feels like or makes the character think is something I have to come up with entirely on my own, LOL.

Edit: On an unrelated note, I love Paul Avril's porny 19th century art.

Edit 2: And you know, reading threads where actual guys talk about the sex they have (in real, honest ways, not in that Penthouse letter way) is seriously hotter to me than any video porn.
emmagrant01: (embarrassed)
Um. I think this might be real. Possibly. It's an awfully good manip... [livejournal.com profile] amanuensis1, you said not to use the word "naked" if it didn't apply. It applies.

If you were freaked out by the semi-naked pics of Dan, for the love of all that is holy, DO NOT CLICK HERE. NOT WORKSAFE OMG. NOT AT ALL.

*flails a bit and feels like a perv*

Originally posted by [livejournal.com profile] herbertvonkoln here. Thanks to [livejournal.com profile] zentariana for pointing to this!

Edit: [livejournal.com profile] gmth points out that the thighs look weird, which is true. Heh. Still. 0_0

Those of you who are a little sensitive to people perving on Dan, just skip this post, okay?
emmagrant01: (embarrassed)
I was going through a drawer last night and came across an issue of Manscape, a little gay porn magazine full of short erotic stories, clearly intended to be held in one hand (aka a "jackoff mag"). It was a souvenir from a slash get-together a couple of years ago, during which we all read excerpts of the stories for entertainment.

And in case you've never read this sort of thing (and some of you might not have), let me just say that it can be highly entertaining. Here's a sample excerpt. As a warning, you might want to set any food or beverages aside. Oh, and explicit content, duh. )

Okay, that's probably enough of that. The thing that amazes me about this story (and believe me, it's pretty typical of the ones in the issue I've got) is that despite the fact that the writing is twelve kinds of bad, it got published. I mean, someone got paid to write that schlock! I'm sure many people who bought the magazine read it and found it incredibly hot, but it leaves me giggling and cringing. It's fine, technically -- the grammar, spelling, and punctuation are correct for the most part. Yet, it's terrible writing.

So let's take this as an exercise, then. What would you say it is that makes this an example of bad writing? If someone sent this to you to beta, what concrit would you give them? Why is it so terribly cringe-worthy?

October 2015

S M T W T F S
    123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
252627 28293031

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 6th, 2025 10:16 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios