Some things to make you think
Nov. 30th, 2004 12:03 pm• An activist college student from maine winds up on the government's watch list, apparently just for speaking her mind. This story is starting to sound very familiar.
• The Supreme Court on Monday sidestepped a dispute over same-sex marriages, rejecting a challenge to the nation's only law sanctioning such unions. Good for them.
• 'They hate our policies, not our freedom.' Quietly released Pentagon report contains major criticisms of Bush administration.
• The Supreme Court on Monday sidestepped a dispute over same-sex marriages, rejecting a challenge to the nation's only law sanctioning such unions. Good for them.
• 'They hate our policies, not our freedom.' Quietly released Pentagon report contains major criticisms of Bush administration.
no subject
Date: 2004-11-30 10:58 am (UTC)Good luck to you.
Do they even recognise same-sex common-law? That's what happened first, here, then it moved forward (in the case of Ontario, was forced by the Supreme Court) to further that to marriage. I guess, that would be a good first step. It would be great if state/US government just...allowed marriage to begin with, but I guess it would have to start somewhere.
no subject
Date: 2004-11-30 11:08 am (UTC)http://canadaonline.about.com/od/samesex/
That has a whole ton of links
Timeline starting from around 1965 for gay rights in Canada It was a long time coming, and is yet to be country-wide, but it's a start.
TMI
Date: 2004-11-30 12:24 pm (UTC)California, at least is making strides in the right direction: AB 205 Domestic Partner Rights and Responsibilities Act of 2003 (http://www.assembly.ca.gov/LGBT_Caucus/laws/2003/ab0205/factsheet.htm)
Thinking about being 'domestic partners' is also putting same-sex marriages more prominent in my mind.
Thanks for the info. Over here, everyone still waits with baited breath (and huge placards).
Emma: Sorry for spamming, but your LJ sparks the most interesting discussions. *hugs*