Some things to make you think
Nov. 30th, 2004 12:03 pm• An activist college student from maine winds up on the government's watch list, apparently just for speaking her mind. This story is starting to sound very familiar.
• The Supreme Court on Monday sidestepped a dispute over same-sex marriages, rejecting a challenge to the nation's only law sanctioning such unions. Good for them.
• 'They hate our policies, not our freedom.' Quietly released Pentagon report contains major criticisms of Bush administration.
• The Supreme Court on Monday sidestepped a dispute over same-sex marriages, rejecting a challenge to the nation's only law sanctioning such unions. Good for them.
• 'They hate our policies, not our freedom.' Quietly released Pentagon report contains major criticisms of Bush administration.
no subject
Date: 2004-11-30 10:07 am (UTC)*wields your icon back at youuuuu*
(this time with fewer html screwups, I hope)
no subject
Date: 2004-11-30 10:40 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-11-30 10:46 am (UTC)I am not trans but still this story bothered me. Man Denied US Citizenship Because Wife Is Transsexual (http://www.365gay.com/newscon04/11/113004tgSuit.htm)
Citizenship and Immigration Services says it "...disallows recognition of change of sex in order for a marriage between two persons born of the same sex to be considered bona fide ... ." California on the other hand "reissues birth certificates to transsexuals after sex change operations and legally recognize them as their new gender." Apparently Federal and State are conflicting each other. *baffled* I feel for this couple and they come from my home country. *shakes head*
There is still a long way to go in the same-sex marriage battle.
no subject
Date: 2004-11-30 10:58 am (UTC)Good luck to you.
Do they even recognise same-sex common-law? That's what happened first, here, then it moved forward (in the case of Ontario, was forced by the Supreme Court) to further that to marriage. I guess, that would be a good first step. It would be great if state/US government just...allowed marriage to begin with, but I guess it would have to start somewhere.
no subject
Date: 2004-11-30 11:08 am (UTC)http://canadaonline.about.com/od/samesex/
That has a whole ton of links
Timeline starting from around 1965 for gay rights in Canada It was a long time coming, and is yet to be country-wide, but it's a start.
TMI
Date: 2004-11-30 12:24 pm (UTC)California, at least is making strides in the right direction: AB 205 Domestic Partner Rights and Responsibilities Act of 2003 (http://www.assembly.ca.gov/LGBT_Caucus/laws/2003/ab0205/factsheet.htm)
Thinking about being 'domestic partners' is also putting same-sex marriages more prominent in my mind.
Thanks for the info. Over here, everyone still waits with baited breath (and huge placards).
Emma: Sorry for spamming, but your LJ sparks the most interesting discussions. *hugs*
no subject
Date: 2004-11-30 12:34 pm (UTC)I was absolutely stunned at what it took for my husband (and other soldiers returning from leave) to get through airport security.
This is how we spent our last half hour together before he returned to Iraq:
He removed everything from his pockets.
He was required to remove his boots.
He was required to remove his BDU shirt. (leaving him in his army brown undershirt)
They went through his bag.
They patted him down. (extensively)
He was required to stand spread-eagle with his hands on the dividing 'wall' while they went over his entire body slowly with a wand (metal detector)
All of this took more than 20 minutes and as I said, this was not an isolated incident, this was happening to several other soldiers as well.
I was offended.
My 5 1/2 year old son was scared and upset by it.
My husband took it all in stride, apparently he had had to do this as every layover (in the U.S.) between Baghdad and Spokane.
Baltimore. Dallas. Denver. Seattle.
I really don't get it. These are U.S. Soldiers, in uniform, moving through U.S. airports. They do not carry weapons with them. This is the respect we show our soldiers who are sacrificing everything for the whims of a madman.
no subject
Date: 2004-11-30 05:04 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-11-30 05:04 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-11-30 05:15 pm (UTC)First story: It boggles my mind that anyone would deny health care to someone, essentially because they are gay. It's simply homophobia in sheep's clothing, and I'm sure it's only the beginning.
Second story: *pulls hair out in frustration* WTF? This is a marriage between two people who identify as male and female, and they're using the fucking DOMA to deny residency? Once again, it's homophobia -- plain and simple.
*steams*
no subject
Date: 2004-11-30 05:17 pm (UTC)