A question
Aug. 27th, 2004 10:42 amWhat's the big deal about GMail? I keep seeing people on my f-list asking for and offering invites, and I have no idea why. When I first heard about the premise, and that Google would "read" the content of emails you send and receive to target advertising to you, etc., I thought, WTF? Why would anyone want to do that?
Clearly people did want to do it, since it quickly became the "it" new email address to have. I'm still skeptical, myself. I'll offer some interesting links, though. Some of these express views that are a bit paranoid, but are still intriguing:
GMail is too creepy
"If Google builds a database of keywords associated with email addresses, the potential for abuse is staggering. Google could grow a database that spits out the email addresses of those who used those keywords. How about words such as "box cutters" in the same email as "airline schedules"? Can you think of anyone who might be interested in obtaining a list of email addresses for that particular combination? Or how about "mp3" with "download"? Since the RIAA has sent subpoenas to Internet service providers and universities in an effort to identify copyright abusers, why should we expect Gmail to be off-limits?"
Things Google knows about you
"If you use a GMail account:
• Who you send emails to
• Who sends emails to you
• The contents of those emails
• The contents of all emails received from any mailing lists of which you are a member, even if they are private mailing lists."
Privacy subtleties of GMail
"Even so, people have a reaction to a 3rd party computer doing scans like this. If you were offered a service that saved you money by having your paper mail opened by robots for scanning, which then inserted new junk mail in your box based on what it found, you might get a bit creeped out. Go further and consider a service that gave you free phone calls if it could have speech-recognizing computers listen in and barge in with product offers related to your conversation? It's easy to imagine an unpleasant situation where you get invited to a gay wedding in Vancouver, and find with it in your mailbox brochures for gifts, Vancouver hotels and a free copy of Out magazine. People have extended that fear into the e-mail realm."
Clearly people did want to do it, since it quickly became the "it" new email address to have. I'm still skeptical, myself. I'll offer some interesting links, though. Some of these express views that are a bit paranoid, but are still intriguing:
GMail is too creepy
"If Google builds a database of keywords associated with email addresses, the potential for abuse is staggering. Google could grow a database that spits out the email addresses of those who used those keywords. How about words such as "box cutters" in the same email as "airline schedules"? Can you think of anyone who might be interested in obtaining a list of email addresses for that particular combination? Or how about "mp3" with "download"? Since the RIAA has sent subpoenas to Internet service providers and universities in an effort to identify copyright abusers, why should we expect Gmail to be off-limits?"
Things Google knows about you
"If you use a GMail account:
• Who you send emails to
• Who sends emails to you
• The contents of those emails
• The contents of all emails received from any mailing lists of which you are a member, even if they are private mailing lists."
Privacy subtleties of GMail
"Even so, people have a reaction to a 3rd party computer doing scans like this. If you were offered a service that saved you money by having your paper mail opened by robots for scanning, which then inserted new junk mail in your box based on what it found, you might get a bit creeped out. Go further and consider a service that gave you free phone calls if it could have speech-recognizing computers listen in and barge in with product offers related to your conversation? It's easy to imagine an unpleasant situation where you get invited to a gay wedding in Vancouver, and find with it in your mailbox brochures for gifts, Vancouver hotels and a free copy of Out magazine. People have extended that fear into the e-mail realm."
no subject
Date: 2004-08-27 09:11 am (UTC)I actually have a gmail account now - a friend had an invite, I was curious, voila!
What am I going to do with it?
I don't know. I'm pretty happy with my yahoo account right now, so I don't plan on scraping it or switching my lj notification over to gmail. So far I am just using it to store stuff I'm working on at home that I want accessable at work and vice versa.
I'm not really paranoid about who might care what I write or recieve, the only laws that are being broken are moral codes I don't subscribe to (hello, ACLU, I'm being persecuted for my religious beliefs and/or sexual practices) and that hazy area of copyright infringement.
I will say the same thing I have always said when the subject of wire tapping or other survailience has come up throughout my life: If they want to watch/listen in on/read about my life, let them, at least they'll get a good laugh and an occasional thrill out of it. I hear most survailience jobs are terminally boring. It's like the security gaurds at Disneyland who fight over who gets to watch the cameras from the PotC ride, because every so often, you get to watch the triad who waited three hours to get a private boat not me, friends, and I had other friends who worked for the mouse at the time. the tape was bootlegged and passed around parties for months afterward
Sorry for the rambling, I am way too tired and way too happy to be at work this morning. le sigh *grins* *hugsemma&thewholeworld*
no subject
Date: 2004-08-27 09:07 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-08-27 09:40 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-08-27 09:08 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-08-27 09:46 am (UTC)So I wouldn't use gmail for anything incriminating. ;) It's really a good interface for mailing lists, though.
no subject
Date: 2004-08-27 09:10 pm (UTC)I actually don't know if GMail is any more or less safe than anything else, but the idea of targeted marketing creeps me out a bit!
no subject
Date: 2004-08-28 06:43 am (UTC)...*shakes head* I'm not quite sure how this got turned into a rant about the government. I think it's election season or something. *oy* *goes to sit down somewhere quiet*
no subject
Date: 2004-08-27 09:50 am (UTC)And my penpals. But mostly those conversations revolve around philosophical ideals or slash morals.
Oh, and also midi files go out to my friends with midinotate so they can have sheet music.
So in any case, I'd like to see what they think of what I send through their systems.
But I am reading through the articles, just because.
no subject
Date: 2004-08-27 09:10 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-08-27 09:38 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-08-27 09:54 am (UTC)Firstly, the third analogy is totally incorrect, Gmail has been by FAR the most Spam-free e-mail I've ever used.
As far as collecting information on the keywords used, I'm far more worried about carnivore, the government's technology to do just that on the entire bloody web, which has been out for yearsand can be used without judicial oversight than I am of the really asinine ads that I get through gmail. They're utterly robotic... they keep offering me Kung Fu movies as related to slash fanfic. Plus, there is NO indication that google is storing that information specifically on gmail customers.
They DO store information on every web-search that is done already for page-ranking purposes, and can track that to your computer IF you allow them to save a cookie. Any e-mail provider is going to know the contents of your messages, and who you send and recieve e-mail from... think about it; the mail is *on their server*. Gmail doesn't really look at it any more than anyone else does, they just use the information differently.
More importantly, I didn't have to enter *ANY* personal information when I signed up for my gmail account... just my desired e-mail address and my name, which was optional. Yahoo required my city, state, zip, real name, and optionally address and phone number as well as age, occupation, and other data so that they could send ads to me. I feel a whole heck of a lot safer with a gmail robot reading the contents of my messages than I do with a person at yahoo knowing my biographical data. My humble opinion, of course.
no subject
Date: 2004-08-27 09:13 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-08-28 07:09 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-08-27 10:03 am (UTC)To be honest, what I find more disconcerting is not that Gmail saves e-mail info, but that companies like the RIAA really would like to get at it. If there were no one around who wanted access to our personal information/communication, then maybe we wouldn't be so paranoid about it.
no subject
Date: 2004-08-27 09:14 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-08-27 10:15 am (UTC)I also don't put much stock in my rights and privacy online. I don't go insanely out of my way to protect myself, really, but I also don't think much stuff online is safe. So, I'm not sure exactly how much can be done anyway. *shrugs*
no subject
Date: 2004-08-27 09:16 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-08-27 10:54 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-08-27 09:17 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-08-27 10:57 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-08-27 11:57 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-08-27 09:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-08-27 12:33 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-08-27 09:19 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-09-01 09:56 pm (UTC)http://www.mozilla.org/products/thunderbird/
Also, thunderbird has brilliant junk mail filters. Just FYI.
Myself, I use pop3 email from my own domain so as to avoid important info being stored on servers like yahoo and hotmail.
no subject
Date: 2004-08-27 01:03 pm (UTC)the only very, very good thing about gmail is that first yahoo and now even hotmail upgraded accounts to 1 gb, that is wonderful, thanks so much google!
no subject
Date: 2004-08-27 09:19 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-08-27 01:21 pm (UTC)Such is why I'm more than happy to pay a nominal $25 fee per year for my own domain. I wouldn't touch yahoo, hotmail or gmail if I were paid to use it. Seriously.
no subject
Date: 2004-08-27 02:39 pm (UTC)Which seems really spooky when you hear about it ("OMG COMPUTERZ R READING MY EMAIL") but when you see it in practice, it's patently obvious that no human eyes have seen what you're writing. Totally not spooky, or at least not any more spooky than any other kind of non-encrypted email; any hacker with a packet sniffer can get his hands on your email with a little bit of work if you're not using a firewall, for example.
no subject
Date: 2004-08-27 04:05 pm (UTC)Yeah. I'll... take your word for whatever that is.
Everyone has their preferences. Mine is for ad-free, spider-free, hassle-free e-mail, period. For the $25 fee I pay, I gain a 100MB web domain with plenty of bandwidth, my own use group, plus an unlimited number of 10MB mailboxes. In other words, no spidering, no ads of any kind whatsover in my webspace or e-mail, and all the e-mail space I could ever want. Hardly required a moment's decision from me. :)
any hacker with a packet sniffer can get his hands on your email with a little bit of work if you're not using a firewall, for example.
That would be an apples and oranges comparison. A firewall is a user's personal choice and responsibility, making spidering and hacking avoidable (or moreso). Gmail does not offer the user that choice, as you said, that's how they pay for their service.
If I were an RPer, I might be tempted to check it out if only for RP purposes, but alas, I stick with LARPing. :)
no subject
Date: 2004-08-28 06:34 am (UTC)Gmail does not offer the user that choice, as you said, that's how they pay for their service.
Ah, but you have the choice not to use Gmail. After all, you're electing that choice yourself. ;)
no subject
Date: 2004-08-27 09:23 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-08-27 02:48 pm (UTC)As
TANSTAAFL, of course. Gmail puts "relevant text ads" on your sidebar. They are non-annoying and non-invasive; they are, in fact, the least annoying advertising on the Internet I have ever seen. Also, unlike other free webmails, Gmail doesn't add a footer to the bottom of your email that serves as advertising for itself. Doesn't need to; the text ads bring in all the revenue it needs.
And the text ads are hilarious if you're writing porn. You have no idea. I've clicked on dozens of ads (which is why the text ads work; people are more likely to click on them if they're "relevant" to what they're talking about, which sometimes they are, and sometimes they're not), and I'm totally OK with computers spidering them. It's not any less secure than any other method of email transmission, unless you use encryption of some kind.
You'd think being married to someone who works in computer security would make me more leery of this sort of thing, but really, I'm not. I'm not willing to do what would be required to genuinely secure all my information and email online (believe me, it is more work than anyone wants to do), and I'm not going to stress about computers reading my porn (I put it online in public so people can read it, for heaven's sake).
One more thing it's useful for: a lot of military people are using it. 1000MB means a lot when you're storing pictures of the kids you haven't seen in six months and you don't want to have to choose which ones you're giving away. I've sent out a few invites to military personnel.
Really, I could go on and on about it. And I've been using it for several months now, and no spammers have glommed it yet, or if they have, Gmail's tackled them and made them cry uncle for me. *beams*
no subject
Date: 2004-08-27 09:36 pm (UTC)So that combined with the ad thing (and I've always paid for email, so I don't have much experience dealing with ad-supported email) made me not so interested. I can see how it would be good for the things you describe, but I don't write that way. I have plenty of space in my email accounts, and so on. I'm happy with AOL, actually. It does a great job of filtering spam. *shrugs*
no subject
Date: 2004-08-27 03:28 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-08-27 09:37 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-08-27 04:23 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-08-27 09:38 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-08-29 07:37 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-08-30 01:07 am (UTC)I just finished reading your beautiful story "Left My Heart"... let me tell you something, it's not only beautiful, it's hot. I don't even smoke and reading it made me feel like I needed boxes and boxes of ciggarette packages.
Wait, that's not my point. Sorry again.
It mentioned something about a sequel and I'm just curious to know if you're still planing to write it. Don't get me wrong, I'm not asking just to piss you off by asking when it will be done, I'm asking because while I never read WIPs, I'm truly curious to know if this story will be continued. I want to keep up with it and I want to know how do I do this. Do I friend you? Do you have a website?
Or if the story is not going to be continued then just ignore this silly comment.
Thank you, for writing the story and if you read this comment then thanks for that too.
no subject
Date: 2004-08-30 06:51 am (UTC)So, yeah, it's coming! :-D The best way to keep informed with that is to watch this LJ. (Feel free to friend me, of course.) I'll also make announcements in the usual places when the final version of LMH gets posted and when the sequel starts. And yes, I do indeed have a web site! It's listed in the Navigation menu on my LJ's main page.
Thanks again!
no subject
Date: 2004-08-30 10:58 am (UTC)I'm friending you, of course and I bookmarked your site. :)
no subject
Date: 2004-08-31 10:31 pm (UTC)As Helens and others have mentioned, it's great for tagging, and since almost all my writing these days is either RPGs or other co-written stuff, it's great. Instead of having 50 separate emails at the end of a fic, they're all threaded together into one. I keep them in my inbox until I tag, then I archive them, and when I get a tag back, it pops the entire thread back into my inbox.
The one thing that's bad about threading is that it works by using the from address, which means all LJ replies will clump together, as will all JF, and all GJ. If someone uses the subject line in a comment then it will see that as a separate email, but how often do people use the subject line? Not very, IME. This really annoyed me at first, because I was used to saving comment replies. Now I've just decided to trash them, because otherwise every new reply popped hundreds of LJ comments back into my inbox in one huge thread.
The storage capacity is a plus for me, too. Verizon's email storage is really small, so even though I check my email several times a day and download it to my HD, deleting it all from the server, if people sent me large files, they would often bounce. I translate doujinshi into English, and most people choose to send me scans to translate from. Obviously the bigger the scans the better, especially since some doujinshi are written by hand and can be very hard to read at smaller sizes. So now I have everyone send me scans to gmail so I don't have to worry about bouncing. It's really been great for that.
The labelling system gmail uses instead of folders appeals to my obsessive-compulsiveness. All my tags get labelled by who I'm tagging with, and if it's a three or four way tag, I can put multiple labels on.
As for the ads, honestly it took me ages to even find where they were. I was expecting something big and obvious, but it's just this little column of text on the side of some emails (not even all of them). Also, the ads are on the side of the threads, not the individual emails, so even if you have 100 emails threaded together, there's only one set of ads. It's much better than the flashing, moving banner ads slapped all over Yahoo and Hotmail.
And the whole "oh no, my email is being read!" thing is laughable when you see what the ads are for. Targetted, my ass. They just pick up on random words. One current fic of mine is called "The High Cost of Renting" and so there's an ad for financial stuff. Another is from the Sable Knot RPG and so there's talk of Eton and Oxford and there are ads about boarding school. Another makes mention of caffiene and being tired and there are ads for tea... Over half the stuff doesn't have any ads at all.
As for the complaint of "gmail encourages you not to delete", the fact is that gmail can encourage you not to all they want, but it's still up to you if you want to delete. I delete stuff all the time and only save that which is essential. And sure Google may still have it on their server even after they've said they deleted it, but so may Hotmail or Yahoo or even my own ISP.
There are a lot of things I like about gmail, but the main uses I can see are for receiving large files and for tagging, so if you do neither, then I think that lessens a lot of its appeal.