*headdesk*

Dec. 17th, 2007 07:11 am
emmagrant01: (Default)
[personal profile] emmagrant01
Jeff Ranieri, a correspondent on the Today show, just explained wind chill as follows: "Whenever you get wind moving across your body, it pulls away the heat molecules from your skin, making you feel that much colder."

I have no words. :-P Okay, I have three: what the fuck?

Date: 2007-12-17 01:19 pm (UTC)
ext_16865: (Default)
From: [identity profile] spinfrog.livejournal.com
ah, the awesomeness of the education in our country :PP

Date: 2007-12-17 01:21 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] emmagrant01.livejournal.com
It's so depressing. :-P

Date: 2007-12-17 01:30 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] asimplechord.livejournal.com
Heat molecules? What molecules are these? Obviously I missed that in my years of chemistry schooling.

Date: 2007-12-17 01:35 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] emmagrant01.livejournal.com
Seriously. I know the science requirements for a degree in journalism aren't that large, but you'd think people would generally know what molecules are. o_0

Date: 2007-12-17 01:36 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] heidi8.livejournal.com
And Global Warming is what happens when the sun shines on an uncloudy day.

(Why do we wonder why the average American has had a hard time understanding Global Warming?)

Date: 2007-12-17 01:50 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] emmagrant01.livejournal.com
I suspect there was a misplaced preposition in the paper handed to him by a producer right before they filmed, or something. Which is possibly even sadder.

But yes on the global warming thing. I'm continually stunned at how little the average person understands about science.

Date: 2007-12-17 01:51 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] blamebrampton.livejournal.com
Now be fair, it's nice that they're recycling 14th-century physics. Practically enironmentally friendly!

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] blamebrampton.livejournal.com - Date: 2007-12-17 01:58 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] ias.livejournal.com - Date: 2007-12-17 02:13 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] blamebrampton.livejournal.com - Date: 2007-12-17 02:27 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] emmagrant01.livejournal.com - Date: 2007-12-17 02:54 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] emmagrant01.livejournal.com - Date: 2007-12-17 02:17 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] blamebrampton.livejournal.com - Date: 2007-12-17 02:35 pm (UTC) - Expand

Date: 2007-12-17 02:20 pm (UTC)
ext_40819: Shifty-eyed starfish from Nemo  (Default)
From: [identity profile] karaz.livejournal.com
At that is usually the difference between a meteorologist and eye candy journalist/weather person. Tell me this person was not a meteorologist?

Date: 2007-12-17 02:22 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] emmagrant01.livejournal.com
Sadly, he appears to be well educated (http://www.weatherplus.com/weathernews/5534708/detail.html). As a meteorologist.
Edited Date: 2007-12-17 02:23 pm (UTC)

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] karaz.livejournal.com - Date: 2007-12-17 02:30 pm (UTC) - Expand

Date: 2007-12-17 02:41 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mirroredimage.livejournal.com
Sometimes, dust can get caught in the sensor and be mistaken for... Soul particles.

Cookies to those that know what I'm talking about!

Date: 2007-12-17 02:52 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] emmagrant01.livejournal.com
Oh, it's right on the tip of my tongue...

*tries to recall*

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] mirroredimage.livejournal.com - Date: 2007-12-17 05:31 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] ellie-nor.livejournal.com - Date: 2007-12-17 05:30 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] freckles42.livejournal.com - Date: 2007-12-17 05:54 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] mirroredimage.livejournal.com - Date: 2007-12-17 05:56 pm (UTC) - Expand

Date: 2007-12-17 02:53 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] therealw.livejournal.com
Next time someone asks me if I'm cold, I'm totally answering "yes, my heat molecules left me".

Date: 2007-12-17 02:54 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] emmagrant01.livejournal.com
LOL. Quick, get that coat on! Trap 'em!

Owwie.

Date: 2007-12-17 03:04 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kagyakusha.livejournal.com
that's just painful.
but sadly, not surprising. And -- seriously, don't feel bad, it's not just your country. the whole world is full of incredibly THICK people.

Re: Owwie.

Date: 2007-12-17 04:00 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] emmagrant01.livejournal.com
I don't know if that makes me feel any better or not. ;-)

Date: 2007-12-17 03:57 pm (UTC)
ext_76751: (Spin the Bottle)
From: [identity profile] rickey-a.livejournal.com
well I wonder if it works in reverse too...Hmm like air conditioning is placing lots of cold molecules around you to push out the hot ones (giggles at self)

Date: 2007-12-17 03:59 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] emmagrant01.livejournal.com
It must be an epic battle. ;-)

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] heidi8.livejournal.com - Date: 2007-12-17 05:00 pm (UTC) - Expand

Date: 2007-12-17 03:58 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] purelyironic.livejournal.com
Oh yes, and body hair protects the body from heat loss, because the heat molecules cling to the hair, so they can't be carried away. Uh-huh.
Edited Date: 2007-12-17 03:58 pm (UTC)

Date: 2007-12-17 03:59 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] emmagrant01.livejournal.com
LOL, yes! Exactly.

Date: 2007-12-17 04:00 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sagcat.livejournal.com
I wonder if these heat molecules are on the skin like some warm, protective coating of warmth, or if they are part of the skin, and the wind sort of rips them off, stealing them from the skin itself. And if you prevent the wind from touching any exposed skin, can we eliminate the environmental problem of "wind chill" altogether? Sort of like a "wear mittens & save the Earth" campaign? We should get this information to the schools immediately.

Perhaps we should write a letter to the producers of the Today Show and ask for clarification.

Date: 2007-12-17 04:01 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] emmagrant01.livejournal.com
Ya know... those heat molecules might be a good alternative energy source. Like for powering your home electronics. ;-)

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] sagcat.livejournal.com - Date: 2007-12-17 08:03 pm (UTC) - Expand

Date: 2007-12-17 05:27 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ellie-nor.livejournal.com
o.O

Oh dear.

Date: 2007-12-17 08:08 pm (UTC)

Date: 2007-12-17 06:01 pm (UTC)
florahart: (wtf)
From: [personal profile] florahart
*takes a stab at what he meant to say*

Perhaps he meant, the molecules of air that have already been heated by heat energy coming off your body. I mean, that can explain the sentence with one very small added syllable (pulls away the heated molecules (of air) from your skin).

*hopes it really is just a failure of noun-to-adjective conversion*

Heat molecules. I wonder if they are red. That would be very Christmassy, anyway...

Date: 2007-12-17 08:08 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] emmagrant01.livejournal.com
I think there may just be a fundamental misconception under there that mere semantics isn't going to fix. Ya know?

Date: 2007-12-17 06:17 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dramedy.livejournal.com
wtf? *headdesk*

Date: 2007-12-17 08:07 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] emmagrant01.livejournal.com
That was pretty much my reaction, yep. :-P

Date: 2007-12-17 06:34 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] joesther.livejournal.com
Oh god. I'm officially embarrassed for this dude. *sigh*

Date: 2007-12-17 08:07 pm (UTC)

Date: 2007-12-17 06:46 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] heinous_bitca.livejournal.com
WE'VE GOT TO OUTRUN THE TEMPERATURE!

Date: 2007-12-17 08:06 pm (UTC)

Date: 2007-12-17 07:20 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] originalintent.livejournal.com
So they're *heated* molecules, not *heat* molecules. Eh. How many watchers of the show would know the difference?

Date: 2007-12-17 08:05 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] emmagrant01.livejournal.com
It was pretty clear from his hand gestures while he talked that he was envisioning actual "molecules of heat" being stripped from one's skin. o_0

The fact that he was explaining this as an "expert" just really, really disturbed me.

Date: 2007-12-17 08:01 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kismetologist.livejournal.com
hahaha heat molecules.
i need to get me some of those.

Date: 2007-12-17 08:05 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] emmagrant01.livejournal.com
If you keep them in a jar, would they glow? ;-)

Date: 2007-12-17 08:03 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cutecoati.livejournal.com
Right.

Whereas the cold molecules cling onto you, forming layer after layer UNTIL YOU BREAK DOWN UNDER THEM AND DIE CUZ THEY ARE EBIL!!!

*headdesks some more*

Date: 2007-12-17 08:06 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] emmagrant01.livejournal.com
There's a theory. ;-)

Date: 2007-12-18 12:23 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] fiona-fawkes.livejournal.com
*snickers* Heat molecules.

Date: 2007-12-26 04:20 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mijan.livejournal.com
And here I thought we had entered the modern age of science.

Oh wait. SCIENCE is fine. It's just the idiots who don't bother to study the basics because they think it's okay to be stupid. Please tell me, WHO was this person? Was he a weatherman? What's his role? I want to bitch-slap him for stupidity.

October 2015

S M T W T F S
    123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
252627 28293031

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated May. 6th, 2026 01:24 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios