emmagrant01: (evil)
[personal profile] emmagrant01
Know what the best thing about the whole [livejournal.com profile] fandom_scruples kerfluffle is?

There's now a lovely list of well-known HP smut writers posted on the journal!

And there's also the adorably wanky [livejournal.com profile] theblacklist community, which is quickly becoming a list of the kinkiest smut written in many fandoms.

God bless the internet.

*goes off to read more*

Date: 2004-01-15 04:47 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] emmagrant01.livejournal.com
It seems pretty obvious -- to me, at least -- that blacklisting people whose work you don't approve of is absolutely the wrong way to go about it. If this person had instead created a "recommendations" list of writers/artists whose work is child-friendly (and whose NC-17 stuff, if any, is password-protected), then that would have been a much more positive way to go about it. She still would have gotten flamed by a few people, but it wouldn't have turned into what it is now.

I mean, come on! The worst way to try to get people to do something is to tell them you're going to publicly announce that they're evil because they don't do it. It's human nature to react by saying, "You can't tell me what to do!" and then to do it more, just to prove you can.

Boycotting is an economic protest strategy. It doesn't even make sense to boycott in this case! Ironically, she's drawing a great deal of attention to exactly the sites she wants people to avoid, and that attention is not coming from the people she expected.

*shrugs*

Date: 2004-01-15 04:57 am (UTC)
thalia: Hermione Granger, caption "This is the wankiest fandom ever.  It says so in 'Hogwarts: a History'" (wanky fandom)
From: [personal profile] thalia
What you said. I'm just not feeling that articulate about it. It's just about the most futile thing I've ever seen; I'm only hoping tomorrow it dies down enough that it's not in 2/3 of the posts on my friends list.

I'm also annoyed because I went through a lot of trouble to get [livejournal.com profile] miraminx's web site listed under all the parental control sites we could find, like Net Nanny, SafeSurf and IRCA (ICRA? I can never remember). And here's this idiot coming along and saying, no, it has to be password-protected, because we need to take the control out of the parents' hands. But I refuse to argue with anyone who's stupid enough to do this.

Date: 2004-01-15 05:04 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] emmagrant01.livejournal.com
Password protection is pretty futile, IMO. Registering, like you did, is really the only way to keep underage kids from getting to your site. You can put up a warnings page (which I do, btw), but kids can still go right in. You can't keep passwords from falling into the hands of pre-teens who are determined to get them.

If parents are just letting their kids surf the 'net with no filtering software, the kids are much more likely to accidentally encounter hard-core pictures than they are to read 60k of fanfic with an explicit sex scene at the end.

You're right that arguing with someone like that is pointless. It'll all be old news by this time next week, anyway!

October 2015

S M T W T F S
    123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
252627 28293031

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated May. 6th, 2026 10:54 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios