asjhasdkjfkdsnskfn'af'a!!!!!
Feb. 3rd, 2007 05:14 pmUm. I think this might be real. Possibly. It's an awfully good manip...
amanuensis1, you said not to use the word "naked" if it didn't apply. It applies.
If you were freaked out by the semi-naked pics of Dan, for the love of all that is holy, DO NOT CLICK HERE. NOT WORKSAFE OMG. NOT AT ALL.
*flails a bit and feels like a perv*
Originally posted by
herbertvonkoln here. Thanks to
zentariana for pointing to this!
Edit:
gmth points out that the thighs look weird, which is true. Heh. Still. 0_0
Those of you who are a little sensitive to people perving on Dan, just skip this post, okay?
If you were freaked out by the semi-naked pics of Dan, for the love of all that is holy, DO NOT CLICK HERE. NOT WORKSAFE OMG. NOT AT ALL.
*flails a bit and feels like a perv*
Originally posted by
Edit:
Those of you who are a little sensitive to people perving on Dan, just skip this post, okay?
no subject
Date: 2007-02-03 11:20 pm (UTC)I don't think it's real. The thighs are too big for the rest of his body, and the horse appears to have no front legs. It's a masterfully done manip though.
And if it is real... wow.
no subject
Date: 2007-02-03 11:22 pm (UTC)*feels like a perv*
no subject
Date: 2007-02-03 11:23 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-03 11:24 pm (UTC)I...I... *flails*
no subject
Date: 2007-02-03 11:25 pm (UTC)Okay, calm now. I don't care if that *was* a manip. My brain just went explody!
no subject
Date: 2007-02-03 11:25 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-03 11:26 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-03 11:27 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-03 11:28 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-03 11:28 pm (UTC)Hee!
no subject
Date: 2007-02-03 11:28 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-03 11:30 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-03 11:31 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-03 11:31 pm (UTC)Is it weird that my first thought was "Forskin. Huh..."
no subject
Date: 2007-02-03 11:31 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-03 11:32 pm (UTC)(er: note; am on the computer with the monitor of suck; everything is too dark)
I don't think it's so much that the thighs are actually too big, as Dan has fairly muscular thighs (WHAT? I like watching muscles work, yes, in the abstract too); I think the quality of the muscle is wrong. Too much toward the power kind of bulk.
I also don't think that's Dan's knee. That does look too wide to make sense for his body,and we've seen his knees before.
Heh.
no subject
Date: 2007-02-03 11:33 pm (UTC)Manip, most likely...but Very nice indeed.
Quite lovely, really. *looks again*
I hope young Mr. Radcliffe lives up to the challenge. Hee.
no subject
Date: 2007-02-03 11:33 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-03 11:34 pm (UTC)... sorry.
no subject
Date: 2007-02-03 11:35 pm (UTC)smudgedblurred. Very impressive 'shop, though. Very well done.In other news... *stares*
no subject
Date: 2007-02-03 11:35 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-03 11:37 pm (UTC)Okay, I feel like a complete pervert now. :-P
no subject
Date: 2007-02-03 11:37 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-03 11:38 pm (UTC)-doesn't feel as pervy-
no subject
Date: 2007-02-03 11:39 pm (UTC)