![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
As seen on several places on my flist, it's apparently an arrestable offense to even be thinking about protesting the Republican National Convention in St. Paul. I won't bother to express my disgust at that, because I know I'm preaching to the choir here.
But there is something that's been bothering me today. You know what always annoys me about anti-abortion folk? They seem to think that being pro-choice means one supports having abortions at every possible opportunity. You know, for fun.
And so today I've heard these clips of delegates over and over, talking about how wonderful it is that Sarah Palin elected to have her 5th child, "even though" he had Down's Syndrome. And how wonderful it is that her 17-year-old pregnant teenage daughter will be having (and keeping) her baby. The clear implication in all of these comments is that these are the morally superior choices, and that only a "pro-life" person would make them. Clearly a godless, feminist liberal like me would choose to have an abortion under those circumstances.
And that utterly, completely misses the point of being pro-choice. Being pro-choice means recognizing that the only person who should make such a decision is the pregnant woman herself. It's none of my business what she chooses, and it's certainly not my place to judge her for her choice. I trust that women are capable of deciding for themselves under what circumstances to give birth to a baby.
Because let me tell you, pregnancy is not all sunshine and puppy dogs. Everybody knows that, but seriously -- being pregnant almost killed me. I mean that literally; I came very close to dying and am still here today by only a stroke of luck. That experience only reinforced my conviction that no woman should be forced to go through a pregnancy she doesn't want, even though the majority of cases turn out fine.
So yay for Sarah Palin and her baby. She made her choice, and I totally respect that. As an aside, initial tests during my pregnancy indicated my son had an increased chance of having DS, and I would not have terminated if it had been confirmed. But I recognize that others might make a different decision based on their life circumstances, and I respect that. Because I'm pro-choice.
And assuming she actually got to make her own choice and wasn't bullied into it because of her mother's political career, yay for Palin's pregnant teenage daughter. I'm sure she'll love that baby and not have any regrets.
But Ms. Palin, isn't it painfully clear to you now that abstinence-only sex "education" doesn't work? I'm just sayin'.
But there is something that's been bothering me today. You know what always annoys me about anti-abortion folk? They seem to think that being pro-choice means one supports having abortions at every possible opportunity. You know, for fun.
And so today I've heard these clips of delegates over and over, talking about how wonderful it is that Sarah Palin elected to have her 5th child, "even though" he had Down's Syndrome. And how wonderful it is that her 17-year-old pregnant teenage daughter will be having (and keeping) her baby. The clear implication in all of these comments is that these are the morally superior choices, and that only a "pro-life" person would make them. Clearly a godless, feminist liberal like me would choose to have an abortion under those circumstances.
And that utterly, completely misses the point of being pro-choice. Being pro-choice means recognizing that the only person who should make such a decision is the pregnant woman herself. It's none of my business what she chooses, and it's certainly not my place to judge her for her choice. I trust that women are capable of deciding for themselves under what circumstances to give birth to a baby.
Because let me tell you, pregnancy is not all sunshine and puppy dogs. Everybody knows that, but seriously -- being pregnant almost killed me. I mean that literally; I came very close to dying and am still here today by only a stroke of luck. That experience only reinforced my conviction that no woman should be forced to go through a pregnancy she doesn't want, even though the majority of cases turn out fine.
So yay for Sarah Palin and her baby. She made her choice, and I totally respect that. As an aside, initial tests during my pregnancy indicated my son had an increased chance of having DS, and I would not have terminated if it had been confirmed. But I recognize that others might make a different decision based on their life circumstances, and I respect that. Because I'm pro-choice.
And assuming she actually got to make her own choice and wasn't bullied into it because of her mother's political career, yay for Palin's pregnant teenage daughter. I'm sure she'll love that baby and not have any regrets.
But Ms. Palin, isn't it painfully clear to you now that abstinence-only sex "education" doesn't work? I'm just sayin'.
no subject
Date: 2008-09-03 02:42 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-03 02:45 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-03 02:50 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-03 02:52 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-03 02:50 am (UTC)Also, when researching abortion? All the Anti-Abortion sites that proclaim that if a woman decides to terminate a pregnancy she will be suicidal, unhappy, incapable of having a working marriage, beaten, and a terrible parent? ARE NOT HELPFUL.
It's not like THE MINUTE I GET PREGNANT I'm going to have the feotus torn out and fed to piranhas. I look forward to having children. When I can give them the life and the love they deserve.
Thanks for givng me a platform, Emma.
no subject
Date: 2008-09-03 02:58 am (UTC)I've never had an abortion, but I had a pregnancy scare when I was 17. I was already researching abortion clinics when my period arrived a week late. And I would have had an abortion if I'd been pregnant then, no question. I could not have been the parent at 17 that I can be now.
(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2008-09-03 02:58 am (UTC)I kind of want to print out what you said here and submit it in the next newsletter I get from my high school. Heh.
no subject
Date: 2008-09-03 03:00 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-03 03:01 am (UTC)just cause
*beams*
no subject
Date: 2008-09-03 03:01 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-03 03:07 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-03 03:25 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-03 03:12 am (UTC)But Ms. Palin, isn't it painfully clear to you now that abstinence-only sex "education" doesn't work?
srsly. EPIC LOGIC FAIL. which she will never concede even when it's staring her and other "abstinence-only" people in the face.
no subject
Date: 2008-09-03 03:25 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2008-09-03 03:13 am (UTC)You are coming at it from an (understandably) negative viewpoint. It is not that we think a pro-choice person would automatically choose an abortion. Rather, we're happy that someone in an important position is finally walking the walk and not just talking the talk. At last, it's not someone who is "pro-life until something bad comes along and then oh crap, abortions are a good thing to have available." This is what we are happy about, because we would rather someone be pro-choice than pro-life until something bad happens.
no subject
Date: 2008-09-03 03:15 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2008-09-03 03:16 am (UTC)Wow. It's like 1968 Chicago all over again.
no subject
Date: 2008-09-03 03:26 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2008-09-03 03:20 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-03 03:27 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2008-09-03 03:33 am (UTC)Personally, I'm a big fan of life and choice both, and not such a big fan of abortion. I sometimes feel just as misunderstood as you've described, because when forced to pick a side, I do identify as pro-life, but I'm not out there lobbying to make abortions illegal. That really doesn't seem like it would solve anything. I'm in favor of improving education and giving women as many options as possible and hopefully reducing the number of unwanted pregnancies from the beginning. In that regard, I do seem to be on the same page as my pro-choice friends.
no subject
Date: 2008-09-03 03:38 am (UTC)I'm not being sarcastic, btw; I really think that's what it would take. :-)
(no subject)
From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2008-09-04 03:37 am (UTC) - Expandno subject
Date: 2008-09-03 03:35 am (UTC)It's just not that simple. I wish politicians didn't try to make it so. Everyone has different life situations.
no subject
Date: 2008-09-03 03:44 am (UTC)That's my frustration, I guess. Being pro-choice is not equal to being all "Yay, abortion!" But that's what a lot of conservatives seem to think.
(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2008-09-03 03:40 am (UTC)You know what always annoys me about anti-abortion folk? They seem to think that being pro-choice means one supports having abortions at every possible opportunity. You know, for fun.
I've always been disgusted by the fact that pro-life people seem to assume that pro-choice equals pro-abortion. Umm, NO. Like you, I've spent most of my life with serious medical issues that, had I ever become pregnant accidentally, might have resulted in me having to give serious consideration to the choices. Luckily for me, I never had to face that, but you can be damn sure that I'm glad that I still have the option there. Though how anyone can think that choosing between your life and the life of your unborn child is in any way fun... I just boggle.
no subject
Date: 2008-09-03 03:46 am (UTC)Yes, absolutely. I've know many women who had abortions, and though none of them regretted their decision, they all said it was one of the hardest things they ever had to go through.
no subject
Date: 2008-09-03 03:43 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-03 03:46 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-03 03:45 am (UTC)"Emma Grant in 2012!!"
no subject
Date: 2008-09-03 03:47 am (UTC)Waaay too many skeletons in my closet! ;-)
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2008-09-03 03:52 am (UTC)She thinks that other people shouldn't be allowed to legally choose to get an abortion even if it is a result of being raped. IMO, that is fuckin' fucked up. I am so far left on this one that to me that is like saying it doesn't matter if some asshole rammed your car on purpose, whiplash is a special miracle from Jesus and you shall not get treatment for it.
She probably won't be able to DO anything about this, it is too difficult to change on a national level. But I am way skeeved by a politician who even believes that, even if they can't do shit about it.
Again, I don't care about her choices or her daughters choices (like you said, assuming she had one). Other people's choices? Arrgh.
no subject
Date: 2008-09-03 03:53 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2008-09-03 04:30 am (UTC)A pregnant 17 year old in this day and age? Either she's an idiot who wants a baby, or her sex education was sorely lacking.
no subject
Date: 2008-09-03 04:47 am (UTC)Pro-choice =/= pro-abortion.
Nobody wants an abortion. You don't wake up one morning and think, "Wow, I think I'll go get knocked up so I can have an abortion!" It's not want thing so much as a, "I think I need" thing.
no subject
Date: 2008-09-03 04:47 am (UTC)In terms of choice... does anyone seriously believe that 17 year old Bristol Palin was given any kind of choice what so ever? I highly doubt it.
no subject
Date: 2008-09-03 11:43 am (UTC)"Now, you aren't going to ruin Mommy's political career again! You get runnin' to that chapel, little girl!"
I'm from the South. I know what this shit is like. >:-|
no subject
Date: 2008-09-03 04:53 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-03 08:34 am (UTC)Well said, Emma.
I'm observing the whole thing from the outside, as usual.
Despite my mum (and me) being Catholic and me dedicating quite a lot of my childhood days to church (in the same way that I would spend time at my gymnastics class), my family is actually not very religious. Today, my confession is nothing but two words written on a piece of paper, and for my mum and my grandma, it's mostly the case of "knowing that someone's there to look after you". The values my family believes in are IMO not Christian, but what I'd consider ..human values.
I've grown up with a very strong conviction of pro-choice, which, to my parents, did not only include abortion, but also political views and one's sexual identity.
It's everyone's own choice, and it's not for anyone else to judge.
Actually, speaking of church, I've just remembered something I haven't thought of in years. It was during one of our church group meetings (communion or confirmation class, I can't remember). There was a priest from another church (no wait, I think he was a bishop) and he was telling us about his work.
He told us that once a woman called him very late at night to talk about the abortion she'd had years ago. She said she couldn't forget and although for her it was the only possible choice at the time - and despite having children now - she was still suffering. He spoke about her without any disapproval, saying that he'd told her that it wasn't for him to judge and that God was with her.
Quite surprising for someone in his position, now that I think of it. (maybe there's hope yet?)
no subject
Date: 2008-09-03 09:53 am (UTC)I am not going into my problems here, but suffice it to say it is a choice. And sometimes it's a hard one. I can't imagine being forced to make it one way or another.
no subject
Date: 2008-09-03 10:33 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-03 01:21 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-03 03:04 pm (UTC)I too am fortunate to not have ever become pregnant. I have a medical condition which may have taken my life during a pregnancy. Fortunately, I was never faced with making a choice, but I would never presume to eliminate any woman's right to do so.
I hope you don't mind, I've friended you.