Okay, this has been coming for a while, and two posts I saw today have triggered this. I don't think these are unpopular fandom opinions, and I want to put them out there in order to tell people that they aren't alone.
1) I have seen lots of posts and comments lately bitching about the fact that Hermione and Ginny are reduced to baby-making machines in the Epilogue, apparently on the sole basis that they are depicted in the Epilogue *gasp* with children.
Okay, what? What about Harry and Ron? Why aren't people complaining that they've been reduced to sperm donors? The assumption seems to be that Harry and Ron are doing "worthwhile" things with their lives, while Hermione and Ginny have been "reduced" to being mere mothers. JKR's comments today notwithstanding, is it really that hard to imagine that Ginny works at the Ministry and Harry stays home with his kids? Or that both of them work and Kreacher is the nanny?
The presumption that a woman who has children is no longer capable of contributing to the world (or that raising children is not itself a contribution) is offensive to me on so many levels that I hardly know where to begin. In a female-dominated fandom, I would expect there to be far more respect for women and their choices than that.
2) I can't believe I have to say this, but: fan fiction does NOT have rules. Fan fiction is about creativity, about telling a story you want to tell. It's about picking up where the author left off, changing something she did in canon that you wish hadn't happened, or envisioning an alternative future for the characters. It's about subtext, reading between the lines, and making the unlikely feasible. It's about slashing characters who hardly glance at each other in the books, just because you want to.
It's about exploring a side of your sexuality you aren't ready to explore in real life. It's about exploring topics that may be difficult to talk about without the medium of fiction. It's about challenging yourself, improving your writing skills, or not -- not everyone is here to be a better writer, and that's okay. It's about interacting with the canon material by giving it your own twist, adding your own interpretation of events.
It's about writing an adventure with characters you love in a universe you obsess over. It's about rewriting a scene you thought the author could have done a better job with. It's about resurrecting a character that you wish hadn't died, or killing off one you wish had. It's about making canon work for you, or ignoring the bits that don't. It's about creating original characters to interact with the canonical ones, even if they're self-insertions. It's about adding something new to a universe you love.
It's about anything you want it to be. There are no rules. That's the point, actually. No one gets to decide what kind of fanfic is allowed in fandom. Everyone has an opinion about what they like and what they don't, and there's nothing wrong with that. But to say a particular genre of fanfic shouldn't be written, or that certain pairings are no longer allowed because canon has established what the "real" pairings are? Not on, people. Not on.
Spoilers likely in comments.
1) I have seen lots of posts and comments lately bitching about the fact that Hermione and Ginny are reduced to baby-making machines in the Epilogue, apparently on the sole basis that they are depicted in the Epilogue *gasp* with children.
Okay, what? What about Harry and Ron? Why aren't people complaining that they've been reduced to sperm donors? The assumption seems to be that Harry and Ron are doing "worthwhile" things with their lives, while Hermione and Ginny have been "reduced" to being mere mothers. JKR's comments today notwithstanding, is it really that hard to imagine that Ginny works at the Ministry and Harry stays home with his kids? Or that both of them work and Kreacher is the nanny?
The presumption that a woman who has children is no longer capable of contributing to the world (or that raising children is not itself a contribution) is offensive to me on so many levels that I hardly know where to begin. In a female-dominated fandom, I would expect there to be far more respect for women and their choices than that.
2) I can't believe I have to say this, but: fan fiction does NOT have rules. Fan fiction is about creativity, about telling a story you want to tell. It's about picking up where the author left off, changing something she did in canon that you wish hadn't happened, or envisioning an alternative future for the characters. It's about subtext, reading between the lines, and making the unlikely feasible. It's about slashing characters who hardly glance at each other in the books, just because you want to.
It's about exploring a side of your sexuality you aren't ready to explore in real life. It's about exploring topics that may be difficult to talk about without the medium of fiction. It's about challenging yourself, improving your writing skills, or not -- not everyone is here to be a better writer, and that's okay. It's about interacting with the canon material by giving it your own twist, adding your own interpretation of events.
It's about writing an adventure with characters you love in a universe you obsess over. It's about rewriting a scene you thought the author could have done a better job with. It's about resurrecting a character that you wish hadn't died, or killing off one you wish had. It's about making canon work for you, or ignoring the bits that don't. It's about creating original characters to interact with the canonical ones, even if they're self-insertions. It's about adding something new to a universe you love.
It's about anything you want it to be. There are no rules. That's the point, actually. No one gets to decide what kind of fanfic is allowed in fandom. Everyone has an opinion about what they like and what they don't, and there's nothing wrong with that. But to say a particular genre of fanfic shouldn't be written, or that certain pairings are no longer allowed because canon has established what the "real" pairings are? Not on, people. Not on.
Spoilers likely in comments.
no subject
Date: 2007-07-27 01:33 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-07-27 01:35 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-07-27 02:06 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2007-07-27 01:39 am (UTC)I think it's something to do with the fact that the women are the ones who are waddling around and having insane mood swings like ducks on acid for 4 months, then have to actually give birth, whereas the guys just get laid and go about without their bodies being warped at all.
no subject
Date: 2007-07-27 02:02 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2007-07-27 01:40 am (UTC)Lol Jergen's dispensers.
no subject
Date: 2007-07-27 01:41 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-07-27 01:41 am (UTC)*chews hand to keep from saying more*
no subject
Date: 2007-07-27 01:41 am (UTC)2. Word!
no subject
Date: 2007-07-27 01:42 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-07-27 01:43 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-07-27 01:46 am (UTC)I'm a professional woman with 4 kids (2 of mine, 2 of hers). Being a Mom isn't the be all end all of who I am but it's a pretty huge part. Can't see why there's anything wrong with that in fiction or in RL.
no subject
Date: 2007-07-27 02:27 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2007-07-27 01:47 am (UTC)But to say a particular genre of fanfic shouldn't be written, or that certain pairings are no longer allowed because canon has established what the "real" pairings are? Not on, people. Not on.
As to the fanfic, people should be able to write whatever they want to write. The choice belongs to the reader. Some people don't want to read Cheating!Harry (or Draco, or whoever). OK, fine. Their call. Some don't want to read slash. Others hate het *cough*. But that decision is the reader's. I'm actually appalled that some people have this kind of audacity. Oh. Wait. This is HP fandom. No I'm not. :P
no subject
Date: 2007-07-27 01:48 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2007-07-27 01:47 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-07-27 02:04 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2007-07-27 01:49 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-07-27 01:57 am (UTC)"Thank you!"
BTW I'm sure JKR will mention what Ginny is up to soon. If she has been home raising her three kids, well that is enough for me. I for one would be happy being HP's wife and mother to his kids. *snicker*
no subject
Date: 2007-07-27 02:01 am (UTC)But I think the anti-motherhood sentiment is just spillage from society today; where young women aren't given a chance to get into good careers because the people in charge think they're 2 seconds away from getting married, pregnant, and demanding maternity leave and half-time etc; where women who have stayed home to have and raise their kids aren't given a chance to get back into the working world at the same level they were when they left; and where working moms have to do too much choosing between their careers and their kids because it's very difficult to have both. The problem with this is, the anger is misplaced. It's not mothers and the trappings of motherhood we should be angry at; it's the continued double standards women are held to in the working world vis a vis our paternalistic society. But that's a whole other essay!
Point 2: hells yeah!
no subject
Date: 2007-07-27 02:17 am (UTC)But that's not bloody likely, is it?
(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2007-07-27 02:04 am (UTC)And Kreacher as the nanny? Who would've ever thought that possible before DH?
no subject
Date: 2007-07-27 02:11 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-07-27 02:04 am (UTC)Oh my God, I want this story so badly! :D
I've heard ranting not just about the motherhood issue but about there being kids in the first place. Which just... I'm sorry, but you know, whether I want kids or not, I'm not offended by their existence and it can sometimes be a relief to realize that most other people aren't, either.
Anyway, the whole "woah kids!" thing struck me as absurdly quick, too, until I did the math -- so, okay, the oldest of Harry and Ginny's kids is twelve or thirteen. So they waited six or seven years to have kids...
...which is totally making me think of what happened in the intervening six or seven years and I really shouldn't be going there yet, but hey...
...which isn't fast at all.
Really, that there's even any question of whether people "can" do whatever they want now that new information's been added seems really odd to me, 'cause it's fanfic, of course you can! That's the whole point!
And coming from TPM, the EWE issue is right up there with The Thing That Didn't Happen... I guess it feels more natural to write off an epilogue and reboot canon from a previous moment when the entire fandom I came into fic for was based on that one thing. :D
no subject
Date: 2007-07-27 02:15 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2007-07-27 02:06 am (UTC)2) I do not agree with you that fanfic is "about making canon work for you, or ignoring the bits that don't", but rules? Nah. Strong opinions, I can dig, but wtf rules? I've heard people go "hee, you can't write Harry/Draco any more because Harry is married to Ginny!1" Um, yeah, watch me do it and do it within canon boundaries, too. :))
All was well. Suddenly, the Hogwarts Express stopped, reversed, and ran over Ginny. Harry was very sad.
no subject
Date: 2007-07-27 02:13 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2007-07-27 02:10 am (UTC)Right on!
no subject
Date: 2007-07-27 02:18 am (UTC)But people saying that ships are sunk? Ships are never sunk! I can do anything I want! I've always found it odd that some folks think that because a ship won't happen in the books it shouldn't happen in fanfic—isn't that what fanfic is for?
no subject
Date: 2007-07-27 02:26 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-07-27 02:26 am (UTC)Regarding mothers: Molly appears to do little else but cook and clean, Narcissa doesn't seem to do anything worth mentioning. Mothers who had careers are either dead or in St Mungo's.
Regarding witches with careers: based upon the evidence in canon, all the female teachers of Hogwarts appear to be single, or if not single then with no young children. Not sure about members of the Wizengamot or Madam Rosmerta.
As for Ginny, isn't it obvious? She's the nanny because Harry's a widower and pining after Draco.
#2 Precisely!
no subject
Date: 2007-07-27 02:34 am (UTC)I guess I don't buy the argument that JKR is sexist in that way.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2007-07-27 02:26 am (UTC)But I applaud your statements, as young women need to know that, terrifying as motherhood is, it can be a worthwhile and laudatory endeavor. And, as you point out, the epilogue does not say whether Hermione or Ginny work outside the home or not, nor what Harry and Ron do. I'm of the opinion that Harry plays professional Quidditch for a while, then becomes an Auror for a very brief while, then decides to be a stay at home dad.
no subject
Date: 2007-07-27 02:33 am (UTC)Oop, I think I just wanked.
no subject
Date: 2007-07-27 02:36 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2007-07-27 02:37 am (UTC)And dear lord yes for rant number #2! PEople are freaking out all over the place about what can and can't be written! WRITE IT ALL! LONG LIVE SLASH!
no subject
Date: 2007-07-27 02:40 am (UTC)There are plenty of canon examples of women who are mothers and work. I listed a bunch of them in a comment above, actually.