OOTP clip, narrated by ignorant asshat.
Jun. 26th, 2007 08:55 amThis was linked to from The Leaky Cauldron, and it's hilarious because the reporter clearly does not know what the fuck she is talking about. She thinks Umbridge is about to stab the Trio in the Forbidden Forest scene (with her wand, perhaps?), and she thinks there is a Harry/Cho/Luna love triangle in the movie. o_0
I mean, come on. Surely someone involved in the production of this segment must have read the books? Apparently not. Haven't these people heard of research? Don't they know how popular these books are, and how stupid it makes them look when they get it so very wrong?
Spoilers for the film, obviously.
I mean, come on. Surely someone involved in the production of this segment must have read the books? Apparently not. Haven't these people heard of research? Don't they know how popular these books are, and how stupid it makes them look when they get it so very wrong?
Spoilers for the film, obviously.
no subject
Date: 2007-06-26 02:08 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-26 02:13 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-26 02:21 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-26 02:24 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-26 02:28 pm (UTC)Then I started to laugh...it's so sad how many incapable journalists are there.
I mean, in times when many people read the book, and it's all over in media, and you're JOURNALIST working in that same media and you report about popular culture...and not to know about it? Come on.
At least I saw sexy Snape in Occlumency class :p
no subject
Date: 2007-06-26 02:29 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-26 02:29 pm (UTC)But... it became increasingly clear that she really had no idea what she was talking about when she mentioned Luna as a love rival. What? Did I miss a huge chunk of OotP? o_o There aren't even hints of that!
no subject
Date: 2007-06-26 02:55 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-26 03:02 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-26 03:02 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-26 03:12 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-26 03:14 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-26 03:19 pm (UTC)But that's the least of her worries.
no subject
Date: 2007-06-26 03:22 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-26 03:47 pm (UTC)Harry Potter is NOT a GEEK. NOT everyone who wears GLASSES is a GEEK! Gah.
You know, I've worked in media on and off for the past 15 years, and I'd say the HP books are well known, and even avidly discussed. There is a segment, however, who only regard the them only as lucrative children's books, and then there are those who are just plain stupid.
no subject
Date: 2007-06-26 04:23 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-26 08:31 pm (UTC)Who hired this bitch anyway?
no subject
Date: 2007-06-26 08:32 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-26 08:33 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-26 08:36 pm (UTC)But seriously, you'd think people would know Harry Potter better than they know middle school math. Maybe...
no subject
Date: 2007-06-26 08:37 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-26 08:37 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-26 08:38 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-26 08:39 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-26 08:40 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-26 08:41 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-26 08:42 pm (UTC)And yeah, what is it with the geek thing? Again, someone who clearly hasn't read the books.
no subject
Date: 2007-06-26 08:43 pm (UTC)Speechless. Which is what this airhead should have been. :P
no subject
Date: 2007-06-26 09:15 pm (UTC)But, I'm not native english speaker, so I'm not the one to judge.:D
American English and British English have different pronunciations in some things. British just sounds right, because Harry Potter is character from British English literature so I'm used to it and on the way they pronounce it.
BTW, I love that icon!! ♥
no subject
Date: 2007-06-26 09:28 pm (UTC)The whole Luna/Harry/Cho thing was funny enough--but the Umbridge stabbing them in the Forest is even worse!
And, it looked in the Harry/Snape leglimency/flashback scene like Voldemort was about to start breakdancing--poor editing on their part I think!
~squees~
Despite their ineptitude, I can't wait to see this movie!
no subject
Date: 2007-06-26 10:51 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-27 12:08 am (UTC)*bangs head against wall*
Hopefully it's all just the idiot tabloid reporters, but...
no subject
Date: 2007-06-27 12:18 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-27 01:29 am (UTC)The woman in the clip should be livid with the people who wrote the copy. They really made her look like an idiot on national tv.
no subject
Date: 2007-06-27 02:50 am (UTC)*Hmm.. the wand's blunt*
Heehee *dies laughing*
Now that Cho/Harry/Luna part is stupid as well. When the woman was describing the part when Snape taught Harry Occlumency, she made it sound like Snape's attacking him. I mean well, he is in a way, but... you get what I mean.
Next time, do research people.
no subject
Date: 2007-06-27 03:24 am (UTC)Wait, I withdraw that. It could lead to one of those wankfests where I learn that of 656 commenters, 653 of them pronounce the "a" in "hat" differently from each other but most especially from me, and anyway courgette is the word for zucchini etc etc etc. And we don't want that again, do we?
Anyway, Emma, if you listen to it again, I'm sure you'll hear the difference.
no subject
Date: 2007-06-27 04:14 am (UTC)You're working on the assumption the movies strictly follow the books, and we know that's not the case. Given that scenes have been altered in the previous movies, perhaps Umbridge is about to stab Harry with her wand ;) I'm grateful they didn't decide to report a love quadrangle made up of Harry/Hermione/Cho/Luna. Can you imagine the shipper wars that comment would have started?
I'm happy to get my Snape fix :D
no subject
Date: 2007-06-27 01:45 pm (UTC)Oh, no, 'a' in 'hat' and 'Harry' is the one that is between 'a' and 'e', 'ae'.
Ok, English language confuses me. :D
no subject
Date: 2007-06-27 02:57 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-27 09:12 pm (UTC)But one of the things that irritates me the most is this explosion of amateur journalist on TV. On commercial TV (especially on specific one) they are, like, picking up the girls from fashion shows and magazine covers. It's unbelievable!
Some awful voices, can't pronounce simple words correctly, not articulate at all, wrong accents, forget to breathe, they let some weird sounds from their noses and sound like they're going to choke from the tempo of their talking! Also, I've seen lots of reports and interviews that have wrong information, they didn't do research about person and then they go and ask some serious questions that are totally outdated or misplaced and EVERYONE (except her/him) knows what happened and when.
But it doesn't matter, as long as they can wear sponsor clothes from companies that produce miniature sizes and they attract male audience.
Actually I don't care if they are toothpick size as long as they do their job properly (yeah, I know, influence on kids, but that's another topic...) and they know what they are doing.
Even the most talented ones have to go through some course or training. This ones only get tight shirts and few layers of make-up and producers are keeping fingers crossed that people will be so bedazzled by looking at them that they won't notice mistakes.
Ok, it's so transparent that is not worthy discussing Why? and How? because it's obvious.
Just a little rant. It crossed my mind. I'm done.
no subject
Date: 2007-06-30 04:55 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-30 05:01 am (UTC)I think the only difference between the British and American "Potter" is a greater emphasis on the "ah" sound in "British English."
(Am I quotation happy, or what?) :)