Aha, my mum took me out on my 21st. I had about ten sips of my first ever alcoholic drink--which, because of my current Clex obsession, made me giggle doubly since it was a "Sex on the Pool Table".
I've only ever seen her drunk once, on her birthday a few years back--and only because my plans for that night had fallen through so I got to see her slurring about the kitchen with her friends.
:) It's not my fault Lex shags Clark over the pool table on a regular basis! I'm just glad I didn't say that to my mum. She'd rescind my net, probably. ^^;;
What freaks me out the most is that the "horse" is really a Shetland pony. A teeny little pony. 0_0 Somehow, when I was thinking it was a horse it was different, because horses are big and powerful and probably wouldn't even notice a dude back there. But ponies are small and... I'm much more concerned about the pony now. :-P
Y'know, I was thinking the same thing. I think he posts on a site encouraging that kind of thing, or something, and it might be his way of mocking them. I hope so. Otherwise, I feel terrible for the pony.
Possibly, but I sort of doubt it in this case. He disappears when drama erupts, and doesn't fan the flames like you'd expect from someone who was just doing it for the lulz. I think he's for real.
Ah ha ha ha. Every so often I say to the S.O., "So, anyway, remember the horsefucker?" And I never actually have any news about it, I just like to hear him sporfle over that word, and answer me, "It is not possible to forget anyone referred to as 'the horsefucker,' dearest." :D
Though to be honest, I'm on the side that couldn't care less what he does. Me=glass house owner=not picking up stones.
Isn't the diversity of human sexuality amazing? I find this story fascinating, probably because of the 0_0 factor. It's amazing to me that there are people who really consider themselves to be in romantic relationships with their pets.
I try really hard to be open-minded about such things -- and fandom has certainly expanded my horizons -- but this sort of story really is at the limit of what I can accept, you know? I really can't make up my mind if this is animal abuse or not, if this guy is whacked or if this is really no different from the sorts of things I like to read about in fic. And so following the story is sort of weirdly exciting. ;-)
So, buried deep in the comments I found this little gem:
Secondly, people still have the right to say something is disgusting to them. I've not met a single fur that doesn't think some subsect of the fandom is gross (be it zoo, vore, transformation, paw, babyfur, mpreg, etc. etc. etc.)
Am I completely depraved or is anyone else curious as hell what those terms mean? It really is like watching a train wreck. "Babyfur"??? I shudder to think.
vore = "vorarephilia," (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vorarephilia) which is "a fetish which focuses primarily upon the consumption of another person or creature, containing another person or creature entirely inside one's body, or being consumed or contained."
But wait, there's more:
"Different vores find different things erotic. Some prefer to be eaten whole; others like to be torn to pieces first. For some, the acts of eating and swallowing themselves are most appealing; others are excited by digestion, excretion, or the sheer idea of being fully inside another person or animal."
Good times.
Also, just in case you were wondering (god knows I was . . . NOT), there is a wikipedia for furries (http://furry.wikia.com/wiki/Vorarephilia) where all these lovely terms are described in excruciating detail.
Which brings me to (oh god) "babyfur" (http://furry.wikia.com/wiki/Babyfur) It really was all that I'd feared expected, but also so much more. For instance, there's babyfur art (http://www.babyfur.com/). Also, it appears to be connected to "paraphilic infantilism" (http://understanding.infantilism.org/), which is another new term I learned just today.
And on that note, I'll sign off. I'm not a jugmental prude by most standards (I mean, hello, I spend my free time writing graphic slash fic), but the furrie scene squicks me out. The best thing I can say about it is that it makes me feel super-duper mainstream every time I get anywhere near it. Which is sort or a trip. LOL.
... ... ...oh, good god. I think I found my first real squick. Furry stuff. Like, I knew it creeped me out on CSI that one time--but part of that was that the next day was Halloween at my sis's school, and seeing lions and tigers dancing around and cuddling on the playground at recess just sent my mind into PLACES WE SHALL NOT MENTION. *twitch*
But I think I have to write some vorarephilia now, with some Pareseltongue thrown in for good measure. Because the snake kink possibilities are endless.
*pretends the snake-swallowing story idea isn't forming in her mind already*
no subject
Date: 2007-03-17 05:45 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-03-17 05:49 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-03-17 05:51 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-03-17 05:53 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-03-17 05:55 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-03-17 04:39 pm (UTC)Ah, it was a good nite.
no subject
Date: 2007-03-17 04:41 pm (UTC)I've only ever seen her drunk once, on her birthday a few years back--and only because my plans for that night had fallen through so I got to see her slurring about the kitchen with her friends.
I don't live in a very alcohol-friendly place. :)
no subject
Date: 2007-03-17 08:00 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-03-17 08:02 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-03-17 05:49 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-03-17 05:54 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-03-17 06:13 am (UTC)I need to go wash out my brain with bleach now.
no subject
Date: 2007-03-17 06:17 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-03-17 09:12 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-03-17 06:32 am (UTC)Love,
Another happy drunk.
no subject
Date: 2007-03-17 06:34 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-03-17 06:37 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-03-18 06:09 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-03-17 06:36 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-03-17 02:36 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-03-17 08:08 pm (UTC)Love the icon btw. Hee.
no subject
Date: 2007-03-18 06:10 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-03-17 08:23 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-03-18 06:11 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-03-17 02:10 pm (UTC)Though to be honest, I'm on the side that couldn't care less what he does. Me=glass house owner=not picking up stones.
no subject
Date: 2007-03-18 06:15 pm (UTC)I try really hard to be open-minded about such things -- and fandom has certainly expanded my horizons -- but this sort of story really is at the limit of what I can accept, you know? I really can't make up my mind if this is animal abuse or not, if this guy is whacked or if this is really no different from the sorts of things I like to read about in fic. And so following the story is sort of weirdly exciting. ;-)
no subject
Date: 2007-03-17 03:24 pm (UTC)So, buried deep in the comments I found this little gem:
Secondly, people still have the right to say something is disgusting to them. I've not met a single fur that doesn't think some subsect of the fandom is gross (be it zoo, vore, transformation, paw, babyfur, mpreg, etc. etc. etc.)
Am I completely depraved or is anyone else curious as hell what those terms mean? It really is like watching a train wreck. "Babyfur"??? I shudder to think.
no subject
Date: 2007-03-17 04:44 pm (UTC)God, it's hard to not go look up those terms, isn't it? I'm frightened I'll break my brain if I look, though.
no subject
Date: 2007-03-17 06:40 pm (UTC)vore = "vorarephilia," (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vorarephilia) which is "a fetish which focuses primarily upon the consumption of another person or creature, containing another person or creature entirely inside one's body, or being consumed or contained."
But wait, there's more:
"Different vores find different things erotic. Some prefer to be eaten whole; others like to be torn to pieces first. For some, the acts of eating and swallowing themselves are most appealing; others are excited by digestion, excretion, or the sheer idea of being fully inside another person or animal."
Good times.
Also, just in case you were wondering (god knows I was . . . NOT), there is a wikipedia for furries (http://furry.wikia.com/wiki/Vorarephilia) where all these lovely terms are described in
excruciatingdetail.Which brings me to (oh god) "babyfur" (http://furry.wikia.com/wiki/Babyfur) It really was all that I'd
fearedexpected, but also so much more. For instance, there's babyfur art (http://www.babyfur.com/). Also, it appears to be connected to "paraphilic infantilism" (http://understanding.infantilism.org/), which is another new term I learned just today.And on that note, I'll sign off. I'm not a jugmental prude by most standards (I mean, hello, I spend my free time writing graphic slash fic), but the furrie scene squicks me out. The best thing I can say about it is that it makes me feel super-duper mainstream every time I get anywhere near it. Which is sort or a trip. LOL.
no subject
Date: 2007-03-17 06:45 pm (UTC)But I think I have to write some vorarephilia now, with some Pareseltongue thrown in for good measure. Because the snake kink possibilities are endless.
*pretends the snake-swallowing story idea isn't forming in her mind already*
no subject
Date: 2007-03-18 06:15 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-03-17 04:32 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-03-18 06:16 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-03-17 06:39 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-03-18 06:16 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-03-18 05:46 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-03-18 06:17 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-03-18 06:50 pm (UTC)