I really loved seeing Harry and Draco interact at the Italian restaurant. Harry was being adorably sweet and out, at least until the waiter acted as if that was completely unacceptable. I know part of it is attributable to Draco's changing perception of Harry, but it's still amazing to see just how much and how quickly Harry has changed over the last few weeks.
I must ask, however: Who did Draco's disguise look like? I assume that at least part of the reason people were staring wasn't just the guy-guy hand-holding, but was actually because of the people involved. And Harry questioned - and smirked at - Draco's disguise. So who did he look like? I assume not Ron, and he already looked like Lucius. Sirius? Manny? Someone famous? *very curious*
And one grammar comment someone probably already caught: "As it would still do, if he wasn't careful." (toward the end of the chapter) This is a conditional/hypothetical statement, so I believe it should be "weren't." Hopefully that's not too nit-picky (or incorrect), it just struck me as I was reading it.
Thanks for the installment! I look forward to next week.
no subject
Date: 2005-05-12 03:16 am (UTC)I really loved seeing Harry and Draco interact at the Italian restaurant. Harry was being adorably sweet and out, at least until the waiter acted as if that was completely unacceptable. I know part of it is attributable to Draco's changing perception of Harry, but it's still amazing to see just how much and how quickly Harry has changed over the last few weeks.
I must ask, however: Who did Draco's disguise look like? I assume that at least part of the reason people were staring wasn't just the guy-guy hand-holding, but was actually because of the people involved. And Harry questioned - and smirked at - Draco's disguise. So who did he look like? I assume not Ron, and he already looked like Lucius. Sirius? Manny? Someone famous? *very curious*
And one grammar comment someone probably already caught:
"As it would still do, if he wasn't careful." (toward the end of the chapter)
This is a conditional/hypothetical statement, so I believe it should be "weren't."
Hopefully that's not too nit-picky (or incorrect), it just struck me as I was reading it.
Thanks for the installment! I look forward to next week.